1. The Problem
We have:
If we try direct substitution ():
This is an indeterminate form — so the limit is not obvious.
Why it’s a Removable Discontinuity
The numerator factors:
So:
For , the cancels:
The function behaves exactly like everywhere except at .
At , the original expression was undefined (division by zero), so there’s a hole in the graph — that’s the removable discontinuity.
Finding the Limit
Now that it’s simplified:
So:
If we define , the discontinuity disappears and the function becomes continuous.
Visualizing
If you graph :
-
It looks like a straight line
-
Except there’s an open circle at
That hole is the removable discontinuity.
Here's a visual representation of f(x).
The left top (the first one) shows the f(x) plotted.

Now let’s walk through L’Hôpital’s Theorem for limits clearly and step-by-step.
The Problem L’Hôpital Solves
Sometimes, when evaluating a limit, direct substitution gives an indeterminate form like:
-
-
These forms mean you can’t just plug in the value — but the limit might still exist.
Example:
Direct substitution → .
Statement of L’Hôpital’s Rule
If:
-
and
OR
and
-
and are differentiable near (except possibly at )
-
near
Then:
provided the limit on the right exists or is .
How It Works (Example)
Example:
Direct substitution → .
Step 1: Differentiate numerator and denominator separately:
Step 2: Apply L’Hôpital’s Rule:
Same answer we got earlier by factoring — but L’Hôpital works even when factoring is messy.
Another Example with
Direct substitution → .
Differentiate top and bottom:
Now:
Notes and Common Mistakes
-
Only use when you get or
(For other indeterminate forms like , , , you may first need algebraic manipulation.)
-
Apply the rule repeatedly if the first derivative still gives or .
-
Remember: Differentiate top and bottom separately, never use the quotient rule here.
2. The Problem
Alright — let’s go step-by-step for
Direct Substitution Check
If ,
That’s an indeterminate form — so we need another method.
Using L’Hôpital’s Rule
We have form. Differentiate top and bottom:
Final Answer:
1
Visualization
See the plot at left column second from top.
3 . The problem
First observation
If , the expression is undefined because we can’t divide by zero.
So we check left-hand limit (LHL) and right-hand limit (RHL) separately.
Right-hand limit ( )
Take as small positive numbers:
|
|
0.1 |
10 |
0.01 |
100 |
0.001 |
1000 |
As , .
Left-hand limit ( )
Take as small negative numbers:
|
|
-0.1 |
-10 |
-0.01 |
-100 |
-0.001 |
-1000 |
As , .
Conclusion
The two one-sided limits are not equal:
Since they differ, the two-sided limit does not exist.
📌 Important: This is an example of an infinite discontinuity.
This is the third graph in the image attached earlier.
4. The problem - Jump Discontinuity
Visualization:
A step function shows a sudden jump — perfect for illustrating discontinuity.
The topmost in the right column of the image attached earlier
4. The Problem
The limit of
is a classic example of a limit that does not exist.
Why it doesn’t exist
As ,
The sine function oscillates between -1 and +1 infinitely often as .
So near , oscillates wildly — no single number is approached.
Formal reasoning
We can try to take the right-hand limit:
Pick sequences:
and
Both and , but the function values approach different limits (0 and 1).
Hence, the limit does not exist.
5. The problem
Alright, let’s check if your function is continuous at .
Given:
Step 1 – Left-hand limit (as )
For ,
Step 2 – Right-hand limit (as )
For ,
Step 3 – Compare limits
Step 4 – Conclusion
Continuity at requires:
But here:
Final Answer: ❌ Not continuous at .
Visualization
The bottom of the left column shows the graphical output of the function
6. The Problem
No comments:
Post a Comment